Amie Boakye, 15 november 2024
“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes”
Mark twain
Alarmist or Honest?
As the United States navigates a time of political and social turmoil, there is an unsettling resemblance to the trajectory of the Weimar Republic in Germany, the democratic government that preceded Adolf Hitler’s rise to power. The story of Weimar Germany is not only a cautionary tale but a stark reminder of how quickly democratic systems can be undermined when faced with a perfect storm of economic, political, and social challenges. The United States today is not 1933 Germany, yet the parallels between the two eras are profound enough to merit serious concern.
1. Economic Turmoil and the Rise of Populism
In Germany’s Weimar years, widespread economic anxiety and social disillusionment created fertile ground for extremism. The 1930s brought Germany’s economy to its knees, with a 30% unemployment rate and a population desperate for relief. While the U.S. today is far from such extreme poverty, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by inflation and rising living costs, have left many Americans feeling similarly unstable. People fear that their security, livelihoods, and identities are slipping away in a fast-changing world. Political leaders have exploited these fears, championing populist messages that emphasize a return to past greatness and blaming minorities, immigrants, and elites for the country’s problems. In both Weimar Germany and today’s America, leaders have positioned themselves as champions for the “forgotten man,” promising to restore what’s been “stolen.” In the U.S., rhetoric about protecting “real Americans” and the country’s “lost greatness” taps into these fears. Former President Donald Trump’s MAGA slogan—Make America Great Again—became a rallying cry for those who felt sidelined by globalization, cultural shifts, and technological changes. Trump and other leaders suggest that a traditional America has been dismantled by outsiders, immigrants, and liberal elites. Such language echoes Hitler’s appeals to Germans who felt betrayed by post-World War I reforms and economic misfortune. It is a strategy rooted in scapegoating: painting certain groups as threats to national purity and prosperity.
2. Erosion of Trust in Institutions
Germany in the 1930s was gripped by a deep mistrust of government, political institutions, and the media. Many Germans felt betrayed by the Treaty of Versailles, viewing it as a humiliating punishment rather than a fair peace settlement. This disillusionment eroded respect for democratic institutions, creating a power vacuum that populist leaders were quick to exploit. Subsequently, one of the Weimar Republic’s fatal flaws was the failure of its democratic institutions to check rising authoritarianism. Germany’s political leaders underestimated the threat Hitler posed, assuming that he could be controlled within the system. But once in power, the Nazis swiftly dismantled democratic structures, seized control of the media, and silenced dissent. The Enabling Act of 1933 gave Hitler unchecked authority, marking the end of Germany’s fragile democracy.
In America, we are seeing a similar erosion of trust. Confidence in government, media, and even the election system has plummeted. The persistence of conspiracy theories, such as the baseless claim that the 2020 election was stolen, has further deepened this mistrust. When truth becomes subjective, when facts can be dismissed as “fake news,” the foundation of democracy itself is weakened. This parallels the Weimar Republic’s struggles, where both left and right-wing factions viewed the government with suspicion and disdain. Weimar Germany’s mainstream conservatives believed they could “hire” Hitler as a puppet, thinking they could control him for their own ends—a dangerous miscalculation. In the United States, Trump has similarly attacked the foundations of democracy, from the media to the judiciary. He frequently referred to the press as “the enemy of the people” and lashed out at judges, calling them “so-called judges” when they ruled against him. When news coverage was unfavorable, he branded it as “fake news.” Though he lacks the legal mechanisms to shut down the press or unilaterally pass laws, Trump’s rhetoric has eroded public trust in these democratic institutions. His relentless discrediting of media and electoral systems, along with the January 6th insurrection attempt, demonstrate how undermining these norms can push democracy to a breaking point.
3. Division and Polarization
A deeply divided political landscape was another key factor in the collapse of Weimar Germany. The inability of left-wing and centrist parties to unite against the Nazi threat left an open door for Hitler to exploit. The German Communist Party labeled the Social Democrats as the “moderate wing of fascism,” contributing to an atmosphere where cooperation seemed impossible. In the United States, the rise of extreme partisanship and political division has made collaboration across the aisle difficult. Political figures increasingly view those from opposing parties not merely as rivals but as enemies. This division is dangerous; it weakens democratic institutions and can enable those who seek to dismantle them. Much like in Weimar Germany, the unwillingness to find common ground has created an atmosphere where extremist views and authoritarian solutions seem appealing to a portion of the population.
4. Social Humiliation and Identity Politics
After World War I, Germany experienced an intense collective humiliation. Many Germans believed they had been unfairly punished and humiliated by the Allied powers. This national humiliation provided fertile ground for extremist ideologies that promised to restore German pride and power.
Today, the U.S. faces its own kind of social fragmentation. Social issues, particularly around race, immigration, and identity, have become increasingly polarized. Leaders within certain political movements have stoked fears that “traditional” American values and identity are under threat, emphasizing the need to reclaim and preserve a certain version of America. This has driven many people to believe they are part of a persecuted class, similar to the German concept of “Volk” or “pure people,” a dangerous narrative that blames others for society’s problems. The racial dynamics in the U.S., while complex and unique, bear a resemblance to the Nazi ideology of racial purity. While modern American demagogues do not explicitly endorse genocide or ethnic cleansing, their use of racial and cultural scapegoating has become a powerful tool for galvanizing support. In the Weimar era, Jews were vilified and blamed for Germany’s economic woes, despite their vast contributions to German society. Today, we see immigrants, LGBTQ+ individuals, and people of color being scapegoated for a variety of societal ills, with politicians using coded language to appeal to racial biases.
5. The Big Lie and the Assault on Truth
One of the most insidious elements of Nazi propaganda was its promotion of the “big lie” — the notion that Germany had not truly lost World War I but had been betrayed by internal enemies. This lie was repeated until it became a core belief for many Germans. Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels famously said, “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.” The Nazis didn’t come to power through a simple majority or a violent overthrow. Hitler’s rise relied on exploiting the democratic system, presenting himself as the voice of the common people against a distant, out-of-touch elite. His claim that Germany had been “stabbed in the back” by internal enemies, particularly Jews and leftists, fueled the idea that “real Germans” were under attack by traitors and foreigners. This narrative gained traction because it was a simple, unifying message that many wanted to believe: Germany’s hardships weren’t random or unavoidable—they were the result of betrayal.
In contemporary America, we see similar tactics with the “big lie” of a stolen 2020 election. Despite substantial evidence that the election was fair, a significant portion of the population believes in the myth of widespread voter fraud. His mantra of “fake news” and the popularization of “alternative facts” created a reality where truth was not determined by facts but by allegiance. This attack on objective truth, coupled with conspiracy theories and misinformation, erodes democratic norms. When facts can be dismissed or twisted to fit an agenda, the public’s ability to hold leaders accountable is undermined, creating fertile ground for authoritarian figures who claim to be the sole source of truth. When institutions like courts, the press, or even former allies contradicted Trump, they became part of the “deep state” conspiracy. This rejection of objective truth is a tactic the Nazis used effectively, creating a world where what’s true depends on who says it.
6. Cultural War and the Control of Education
The Nazis understood the importance of controlling cultural and educational institutions. Once in power, they censored newspapers, removed noncompliant educators, and banned books they considered dangerous. This control over culture was instrumental in consolidating their rule and eliminating dissent. Today, some American leaders have initiated campaigns to restrict what is taught in schools, especially topics related to race, gender, and America’s history of slavery. There are also increasing attempts to ban books that do not conform to certain ideologies. In Texas, Florida, and other states, school boards and state legislatures have been pushing to limit discussions on these subjects, claiming they promote divisiveness. However, by censoring or sanitizing history, society loses an essential tool for understanding itself. The push to control educational narratives bears a worrying resemblance to the tactics used by the Nazis to shape public opinion and marginalize dissent.
7. Law and Order: When Security Becomes the Excuse for Control
Law and order became a dominant theme in Nazi Germany, where the promise of safety and stability was used to justify authoritarian control. The Nazis leveraged societal fears of violence and unrest to suppress dissent, outlaw opposition, and remove those they deemed undesirable. They presented themselves as the only solution to Germany’s problems, offering strongman solutions to complex issues. Trump and other leaders in the U.S. have similarly positioned themselves as defenders of law and order, though without the overt violence of Nazi rule. Trump’s calls to “dominate” protesters during the George Floyd protests and his repeated warnings of crime in American cities echo the language of those who see strict control as the only answer. His speeches portray cities with large minority populations as “war zones” and promise to bring in the military or to “put the handcuffs back on the criminals.” This rhetoric goes beyond addressing actual issues of crime; it taps into fears and proposes a simplistic answer: the elimination of those seen as threats.
Let us not forget that the United States is not immune to its own dark chapters of injustice, particularly during World War II when it forcibly relocated and incarcerated over 120,000 Japanese Americans in concentration camps. Following the attack on Pearl Harbor, fear and prejudice swept the nation, leading to an executive order that uprooted Japanese American families from their homes, businesses, and communities. These men, women, and children—most of them U.S. citizens or legal residents—were subjected to a systematic denial of their rights, confined in barren, overcrowded camps under harsh conditions for years. The rationale behind these camps was framed as “national security,” but in reality, this policy was fueled by racial prejudice and wartime hysteria. No evidence of espionage or disloyalty was found to justify the imprisonment of Japanese Americans. Nevertheless, families lost everything: businesses they had spent a lifetime building, homes they had established, and a sense of belonging in the country they called their own. The trauma from this era left lasting scars, not only for the Japanese American community but also for American society as a whole, casting a long shadow on the ideals of equality and justice. Let this history serve as a powerful reminder that the values of equality and justice must be safeguarded against any impulse to dehumanize or isolate groups within our society.
8. The Rise of Scapegoating
The Politics of division
In Weimar Germany, scapegoating was not just rhetoric but a central ideology, one that quickly escalated into terrifying action. The Jews, communists, and other minority groups were accused of causing Germany’s decline, accused of lacking true German loyalty. The Nazis constructed an entire apparatus of laws, policies, and propaganda to otherize these groups. This division didn’t only gain followers for the Nazis; it desensitized the population to the persecution and eventual genocide that followed.
The echoes of this scapegoating are evident in modern U.S. politics, where “us vs. them” narratives have become disturbingly common. Trump has frequently used inflammatory language to vilify immigrants, Muslims, and LGBTQ+ people. He has warned of immigrant “caravans” filled with criminals and suggested that Muslims in the U.S. need to be tracked. His speeches often paint a dark picture of an America overrun by “outsiders” who, he claims, endanger American values and safety. This rhetoric normalizes bigotry and provides a cover for policies that strip rights from these groups. And while there is no current equivalency to Nazi policies, the path of dehumanization is one history has shown us time and time again.
8. The Road Ahead: Preventing History from Rhyming
Can We Stop the Echoes?
The United States is not Germany in 1933, but the echoes are too loud to ignore. As historian Tom Mockaitis points out, “It can happen here.” The Weimar Republic fell, not because its democracy was inherently weak, but because those who believed in it underestimated the appeal of authoritarian solutions. The current political climate in the U.S. shows that democratic norms and institutions, if left unchecked, can be eroded from within. American history teaches us that democracy can be fragile, as with the civil rights struggles and the political divides of the Vietnam era. Complacency, partisanship, and denial allowed the forces of fascism to rise unchecked until it was too late.
America must remain vigilant. Protecting democracy requires not only defending the institutions that uphold it but also resisting the temptation of quick, authoritarian fixes to complex problems. It means building trust in the democratic process, grounding respect for truth, and actively combating scapegoating and division.
As we face economic uncertainty, social division, and political polarization, we should remember the cautionary tale of the Weimar Republic. History may not repeat, but its echoes are powerful reminders that the defense of democracy is a constant, active endeavor. Understanding the parallels between Weimar Germany and today’s U.S. is not an act of alarmism but of awareness. As Twain’s words remind us, history rhymes, and these echoes call us to vigilance. The U.S. has an opportunity to learn from Germany’s history, strengthening its commitment to democratic values, rejecting divisive scapegoating, and grounding trust in institutions whether new or old. The lessons from Weimar remind us that democracy depends not just on the structures of government but on the actions of its citizens to defend it. We must heed these lessons before they manifest once more in ways that will be much harder to reverse.
Unmissable Reads you want on your shelf
- The Diary of Anne Frank
- The Economics of Discontent: From Failing Elites to The Rise of Populism
- The Emotional Life of Populism: How Fear, Disgust, Resentment, and Love Undermine Democracy
- Grassroots Activisms: Public Rhetorics in Localized Contexts (Intersectional Rhetorics)
- Blessed Are the Organized: Grassroots Democracy in America
- Return of the Strong Gods: Nationalism, Populism, and the Future of the West
- Rights Refused: Grassroots Activism and State Violence in Myanmar (Stanford Studies in Human Rights)
Being a POC at a PWI Blog: https://amiemboakye.com/being-a-poc-in-a-pwi-setting/
Signing Off, XOXO, Amie.
Discover more from No one tells you how to survive in college
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Leave a Reply